# Dynamic Analysis Contact Parameter Problem in UDEC

**URL:** <https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/dynamic-analysis-contact-parameter-problem-in-udec/1432>\
**Category:** UDEC\
**Created:** [April 30, 2024, 6:21pm UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/dynamic-analysis-contact-parameter-problem-in-udec/1432 "2024-04-30T18:21:46Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 2\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![SamVarun10](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/s/b782af/32.png) [@SamVarun10](https://forum.itascainternational.com/u/SamVarun10)\
**Post date:** [April 30, 2024, 6:21pm UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/dynamic-analysis-contact-parameter-problem-in-udec/1432/1 "2024-04-30T18:21:46Z")

</div>

Hello everyone,  
I am performing a dynamic analysis test on SHPB Test Sample. I have attached a sample code for the same:  
model new  
block tolerance corner-round-length 3.4E-7  
block tolerance minimum-edge-length 6.8E-4  
block contact tolerance overlap 0.010  
block create polygon 0 0 0 0.050 5.016 0.050 5.016 0  
block cut crack 2.975 0 2.975 0.050  
block cut crack 3.009 0 3.009 0.050  
block hide  
block seek id-list 1,2  
block zone gen quad 0.010  
block zone cmodel assign elastic density 8000 bulk 166.7e9 shear 76.92e9 range pos-x 0 2.975  
block zone cmodel assign elastic density 8000 bulk 166.7e9 shear 76.92e9 range pos-x 3.009 5.016  
block seek  
block hide id-list 1,2  
block cut crack 2.975 0.008 3.009 0.008  
block cut crack 2.975 0.042 3.009 0.042  
block delete id-list 3,5  
block cut voronoi edge-maximum 0.004 iterations 100 round 1E-4  
block zone gen edge 0.004  
block hide id-list 1,2  
block zone cmodel assign elastic density 1900 bulk 5.397E9 shear 2.636E9 ;Model Material from Journal  
block seek  
;Contact Properties  
block contact cmodel assign residual st-s 2.5e13 st-n 5E13 friction 55 …  
cohesion 80E6 tension 350e6 …  
friction-residual 55 cohesion-residual 80E6 tension-residual 350e6  
fish define wave  
if block.mechanical.time.total \> 1.0 / freq  
wave = 0.0  
else  
wave = 1_math.sin(1.0_math.pi_freq_block.mechanical.time.total)  
endif  
end  
fish set @freq=5000  
@wave  
block gridpoint apply bulk 166.7E9 shear 76.92E9 density 8000  
block gridpoint apply visc-x range pos-x 5.016 tolerance 0.00001  
block gridpoint apply visc-x range pos-x 0 tolerance 0.00001  
block gridpoint apply visc-y range pos-x 5.016 tolerance 0.00001  
block gridpoint apply visc-y range pos-x 0 tolerance 0.00001  
block edge apply stress 382E6 0.0 0.0 history @wave range pos-x -0.001 0.001 pos-y 0.000 0.050  
block mechanical history time-total  
block mechanical damping 0.0 0.0  
block zone history stress-xx 1.4875 0.050  
block zone history stress-xx 4.0125 0.050  
block cycle time 2E-3

Here the contact microparameter - Contact tensile strength for a value of 350E6 gives desirable result i.e. Incident+Reflected Stress Pulse should be equal to Reflected Pulse  
But isn’t this value not realistic?

 ![image](https://canada1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/uploads/itasca/original/2X/3/3e6b3646b17ccdf2f6ab8f694c8a788a140f6e44.png)  
Top figure is the stress pulse for incident bar  
Bottom figure is the stress pulse for transmission bar  
Can somebody please convey what is the issue here?  
What should be done so that this contact tensile strength value becomes realistic.  
General UCS value of sample is 60 MPa and Tensile Strength is 6MPa

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![udecsupport](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/u/e9c0ed/32.png) [@udecsupport](https://forum.itascainternational.com/u/udecsupport)\
**Post date:** [May 2, 2024, 3:00pm UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/dynamic-analysis-contact-parameter-problem-in-udec/1432/2 "2024-05-02T15:00:56Z")

</div>

The strength of the joint will affect the amount of energy that is transmitted, reflected or absorbed. There is an example of this for a shear wave in the UDEC 7.0 manual (Special features volume page 4-60). For a pressure pulse, I assume the tensile strength of the joint would be critical.
