# Time-dependent jointed rock response

**URL:** https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/time-dependent-jointed-rock-response/927
**Category:** 3DEC
**Created:** [February 16, 2023, 10:18am UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/time-dependent-jointed-rock-response/927 "2023-02-16T10:18:03Z")
**Posts on this page:** 2
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![VijayKiranKota](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/v/c4cdca/32.png) [@VijayKiranKota](https://forum.itascainternational.com/u/VijayKiranKota)
#### Post date: [February 16, 2023, 10:18am UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/time-dependent-jointed-rock-response/927/1 "2023-02-16T10:18:03Z")

</div>

Hi,  
Can I use a time-dependent (Burgers/CVISC/WIPP) creep model for zones and a non-time-dependent (Elastic/MC-slip/CY) model for joints? What result would such a combination have in simulating a jointed rockmass?  
Let me know your thoughts.  
Thanks,  
Vijay

---

<div class="post-metadata">

### Author: ![Theophile](https://yyz1.discourse-cdn.com/flex031/user_avatar/forum.itascainternational.com/theophile/32/299_2.png) [@Theophile](https://forum.itascainternational.com/u/Theophile)
#### Post date: [February 17, 2023, 2:17pm UTC](https://forum.itascainternational.com/t/time-dependent-jointed-rock-response/927/2 "2023-02-17T14:17:12Z")

</div>

Hi!

I’m no expert in dynamic models, here, so I’m just sharing my thoughts.

To me, there is no reason why you could _not_ do so: a time-dependent matrix versus a static joint mostly implies that the joint response is immediate (or at least, way faster than the matrix’s).

However, I am not sure that _any_ models combination would be relevant.  
Indeed, if we consider that a joint results from the rupture of its host rock, I would expect the joint to inherit its properties (or at least some of them) from the nature of its host rock. For example, a rigid and/or brittle rock would _a priori_ create a brittle joint, and a ductile rock would create a ductile joint. This question becomes even more complex if you consider that joints infills can alter their initial properties (_e.g._, calcareous deposits would bring a more fragile joint, and argillaceous would bring a more ductile one). And obviously, dynamic models give additional complexity.

Maybe you can start off with simple models and do step-by-step evolutions:

- elastic matrix / elastic joint
- viscous matrix /elastic joint
- elastic matrix / Mohr-Coulomb joint
- viscous matrix / Mohr-Coulomb joint
- …

After a (very) brief check on the literature, I could not find publications regarding this subject.

Hope you can get some interesting results!

Regards,

Théophile
